Reinsurance Focus

Claimant, Square Mile Partnership (“Square Mile”), entered into an agreement with Robert Bruce Fitzmaurice Group (“RBF Group”) for the purchase of the shares of Robert Bruce Fitzmaurice (“RBF”), RBF Group’s direct subsidiary, a Lloyd’s broker. The agreement provided for the transfer of RBF’s “accumulated net worth” to Square Mile. The day before completion of the agreement, the transfer took place in favor of Fitzmaurice McCall (“Fitzmaurice”), RBF’s ultimate holding company. The amount of the payment was calculated on the basis of RBF’s distributable dividends.

After completion of the agreement, a dispute arose between Square Mile and Fitzmaurice concerning the exact meaning of the expression “accumulated net worth.” According to Square Mile, it referred only to RBF’s distributable profits, while according to Fitzmaurice it meant the whole of RBF’s net assets.

The court concluded that the expression “accumulated net worth” was intended to cover all the nets assets of RBF. As to Square Mile’s argument that the amount actually transferred from RBF Group to Fitzmaurice a day before completion of the agreement, the court explained that to the extent to which this argument relied on evidence of precontractual negotiations it could not be admitted. While English law does offer some exceptions to the general rule that precontractual negotiations are inadmissible as evidence for the interpretation of a written agreement, the Court concluded that the exceptions were not warranted in this case. The Square Mile Partnership Ltd v. Fitzmaurice McCall Ltd, [2006] EWCA Civ. 1689 (Dec. 18, 2006).

The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act, which is implemented through the Terrorism Insurance Program of the Department of the Treasury, expires at the end of 2007. A bill had been filed to extend the program for 10 years and add coverage for group life insurance and nuclear, chemical, biological and radiological risks. A Treasury official has stated that the program must be temporary and short-term, should provide for increased participation by the private sector in the covered risks, and rejected the proposal for inclusion of group life insurance. During a prior renewal of the program, the Treasury Department opposed adding group life insurance to the coverage of the program. The proposed renewal bill is H.R. 2761.

Russell Investment Group reportedly is updating its criteria for including companies in its market indexes, with the likely result that companies incorporated in Bermuda could be considered for inclusion in the indexes. There is speculation in the media that this could result in the inclusion of Bermuda-based insurers and reinsurers for the first time, and that a recent increase in the share price of such companies may have been related to speculation with respect to this issue. See the story.

The Financial Services Authority, which regulates the UK insurance markets, has issued a report titled Financial Risk Outlook 2007, a 115 page report which evaluates priority risks in the financial markets, economic and financial conditions, developments in the industry, consumer's engagement with the industry, financial crime, and the legal and regulatory framework of the financial markets. While there is not a specific section discussing the reinsurance markets, there is a brief discussion of general insurance markets and life insurance in particular.

The World Economic Forum, in collaboration with Citigroup, March & McLennan Companies, Swiss Re and the Wharton School Risk Center, has published Global Risks 2007: a global risk network report. The report describes and analyzes what the report describes as 23 “core global risks,” including pandemics, climate change, oil shock and terrorism, and suggests possible institutional innovations that may help mobilize businesses and governments to address the risks, as well as strategies for mitigating such risks.

New Florida Governor Charlie Crist has signed his first bill into law, House Bill 1A from a special session of the Florida Legislature dealing with insurance rates for homeowners. One of the principal goals of the special session was to increase the availability and lower the cost of homeowners insurance, particularly in coastal areas. A House of Representatives staff analysis of the bill contains background information about the insurance market in Florida and the impact of the eight major hurricanes that hit Florida during the 2004 and 2005 hurricane seasons. The staff analysis reports that claims payments were made relating to the eight hurricanes totaling $33,346,477,364, and describes the resulting impact on the number of insurers writing homeowners coverage in the state, the cost of coverage and the cost of reinsurance.

This 176 page bill makes extensive changes to the Florida property insurance and reinsurance markets. The changes are summarized in the staff analysis. Among the changes is expanding the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund to provide a “temporary emergency program” for the 2007, 2008 and 2009 hurricane seasons providing less expensive reinsurance for insurers. Savings from the reduced cost of reinsurance must be passed on to consumers. It is unclear what the impact of this new law will be on the reinsurance market, but a large amount of reinsurance premium may now be diverted from the private reinsurance market to the public avenues set up or modified in this bill.

One of the more intriguing articles about reinsurance recently has been one which suggests that North Korea may be engaged in massive reinsurance claim fraud to generate hard currency for its ailing economy. All insurance in North Korea is written through one state-owned company, which reinsures the risks through Lloyds and non-Lloyds reinsurance companies. It is suspected that North Korea has been submitting bogus claims and claims with phony documentation, encompassing losses aggregating as much as $150 million. The closed nature of the society prevents reinsurers or claims agents from investigating the losses. This is interesting reading at Foxnews.com (until they archive the link).

Readers of this blog may be interested in exploring Re Risk, a blog relating to reinsurance maintained by Jolyon Patten, a solicitor specializing in reinsurance and insurance law with the UK Halliwells law firm. Re Risk aims to be a rolling and relatively informal round-up of news and commentary about the London insurance and reinsurance market. It provides a great variety of information and opinions relating to the London markets in an entertaining and informative format.

Standard & Poors recently lowered its ratings on Swiss Re to AA-. This action is notable not so much because of its potential impact upon Swiss Re, but because it means that there are now no stand-alone reinsurers that have a S&P rating of above AA-. S&P views the reinsurance industry to be volatile and underperforming in terms of earnings.

If you are wondering about the meaning of a particular term or phrase, try the glossary of reinsurance terms, presented by the Internet site captive.com.